Hello everyone. My name is Colin Greenbauer and it is March 23, 2009. Today I am going to be tackling an issue that may not be on your mind. We all love it, and many of us are even obsessed and addicted to it. Reality TV! I know that there might be many people who refuse to watch typical reality shows like American Idol or Dancing with the Stars, but there is still an overwhelming audience who are glued to their TV sets every week. These reality stars become more than just household names. They become friends, role models, counselors, and even lovers. People all over the world have bought into this cheap and dense style of television. Is it healthy for us viewers? Of course, it would not be an issue if everyone understood that there is a glass screen between us and them. But, not everyone is media literate and able to distinguish fantasy from reality. TV is a scapegoat. It’s a way for people to come together and not feel alone. But most importantly, its entertainment. I enjoy reality TV shows, but would just like to see more shows that have more substance. I need more from my reality TV viewing. In short, reality TV has hit the scene and made it big. It’s not going anywhere. People are immersed in this culture and it can become dangerous if people cannot discern the real from the fake. In order to combat this, we need to become more media literate and hopefully be able to view some fresh new shows that have little more going on then sex, alcohol, and models.
Thank you all for tuning in. I’m Colin Greenbauer, urging all of you to enjoy responsibly. Have a great night.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Monday, March 16, 2009
Selig's Strapping Stipend
Dear MLB Commissioner Bud Selig,
I am writing this letter as a concerned lifelong baseball fan. Baseball is America’s pastime. Even though it has taken many blows throughout the years, it always seems to find a way to brush it off and step back in the box. In the early days it was the Great Depression and the World Wars. In 1994, a labor strike hit due to salary cap issues. Recently, the era of steroids has marked its stain on our precious game; once again damaging baseball’s credibility to its players and fans.
I understand your job is not the easiest, but I hope you realize what a special opportunity you have to be a part of the greatest game under the lights. There are many problems you have faced as the Commissioner. Everything from young Latin American ballplayers lying about their age to make them seem younger to prospective ball clubs, to the slow start and potential failure of the World Baseball Classic, and of course, steroids. However, I am not writing to you to talk about these problems. My concern lies within the pockets of every baseball player, fan, executive, and you, the Commissioner.
According to Yogi Berra, “A nickel aint worth a dime anymore.” This was the good old days of baseball when players where not concerned entirely about what they were getting paid. They loved the game and played it with passion. Nowadays, players are making such ridiculous amounts of money that it makes real baseball fans wonder if those players can even spend that much money in one lifetime. I am sure the Babe would roll over in his grave if he knew what has happened to player’s salaries.
The fact is elite players of today are making too much money. They are not even showing up to spring-training until they can have an extra million in guaranteed cash or a couple million added to each year of their contract. This is absurd. What message are these role models sending the youth of baseball when they see these men not join their team for practice and conditioning because of money? I understand baseball is a big business worth a lot of money; however, is it worth to put a price on the greatest game this country has ever seen?
Let’s look at the numbers. Obviously, we can start with Alex Rodriquez who has signed the two largest contracts in baseball history. The Texas Rangers set the bar with A-Rod when they gave him a $252,000,000 contract from 2001-2010. He did not stay with Rangers, but was then given the largest deal in baseball history by the New York Yankees at $275,000,000 from 2008-2017. Granted he may not see every penny, but it is still astonishing to fans to see all these zeros given to one player. Arguably, he is the best player in the game, but there are still many players that can play at the same level and give him a run for his money. In return, they too want the large contracts.
Let’s now look at Manny Ramirez who will better help make my point. The plague of the Boston Red Sox is no giving headaches to the Los Angeles Dodgers. The man has not yet joined his club for spring-training because he is having contractual disputes between his agent and the club. He has been offered a two year, $45,000,000 deal; however, Mr. Ramirez wants more. He wants $25,000,000 a year and will not settle for less. Although he did not receive the deal he desired, he is now a Dodger and agreed to the initial deal proposed. One might blame this on his Agent Scott Boras, but one only has to look at the way Manny plays the game to realize he is all about the money. He might just be the best hitter in the game, but he does not hustle in the outfield and has even taken himself out of games. Many fans hate this and are losing respect for him everyday he does not put on a uniform.
I would also like to make an argument for those players who are underpaid. I understand there are rules surrounding contracts for rookie players and players with limited Major League service, but Tim Lincecum for the San Francisco Giants was the most dominating pitcher in all of baseball last season and even won the NL Cy Young award. He is not eligible for the big bucks yet, so he had to settle with an insulting deal of $650,000 for one year. The playing field needs to be equal and Lincecum deserves a big contract. Mr. Selig, if you are going to allow high profile players to make these types of numbers, then you need to make a change and allow every player to have the opportunity for large contracts.
Without a salary cap there is little anyone can do to stop these players from making the big bucks, but I am really writing to you because of your earnings. The players are not the only ones getting paid, you are too. According to Street and Smith’s Sports Business Journal, you made $18.35 million last year. That is a lot money Mr. Selig. Should a Commissioner be making this type of money? I am sure if you ask fans, writers, and even some players, they would say you are making too much.
I cannot ask you to turn down such dollar figures, but I can ask you to use some of the money to make the game of baseball better. This starts with the youth. Maybe some of your money along with other high profile players should be allocated for new ball-fields and leagues throughout the inner cities and poor areas of our country. Many major league players have been scouted since they were real young and had all the facilities they needed to make it to the Major Leagues. Unless an unfortunate child has phenomenal natural abilities, he is most likely not going to have the proper equipment or exposure to adequate coaching to enhance his skills.
How about this? Maybe you can use some millions to help lower ticket prices, parking, and concession stand prices so that more people can afford to make it out to the ball-park. The fans are the consumers of baseball, so maybe baseball can return the favor and give back to fans. I understand implementing a salary cap on baseball organizations would be virtually impossible; however, a maximum yearly salary for individual players is not too much to ask for.
You are the Commissioner of the greatest game ever played. With steroids aside, it is now up to you help bring baseball back to the fans. Please try and stop players form bellyaching about their contracts and simply, just play ball. Make this game fun again for everyone including the fans, players, and yourself. I am sure you have lost some sleep over what baseball has gone through during your time as Commissioner, but it really cannot be that hard to rest your head on that 18.35 million dollar pillow.
Sincerely,
Colin Greenbauer
Works Cited
"Baseball Money." 23 Oct. 2008 Online image. 16 Mar. 2009.
"Bud Selig." Oniline image. 16 Mar. 2009.
“Inside Alex Rodriguez’s Record Deal.” USAToday. 12 Dec. 2000 15 Mar. 2009.
Fisher, Eric. “Selig’s Pay Climbs Past $18 Million.” Street & Smith’s Sports Business Journal. 2 Feb. 2009 2 Mar. 2009.
“Lincecum, Giants Agree to $650K Contract.” Associated Press. 26 Feb. 2009 FOXSports.Com. 2 Mar. 2009.
“Rodriguez Finalizes $275 M Deal with Yankees.” Associated Press. 13 Dec. 2007 ESPN. 15 Mar. 2009.
Rosenthal, Ken. “Everyone is Happy’: Dodgers get Manny for $45 M.” FOXSports.com. 26 Feb. 2009 2 Mar. 2009.
“Yogi Berra Quotes.” BrainyQuote. 15 Mar. 2009.
I am writing this letter as a concerned lifelong baseball fan. Baseball is America’s pastime. Even though it has taken many blows throughout the years, it always seems to find a way to brush it off and step back in the box. In the early days it was the Great Depression and the World Wars. In 1994, a labor strike hit due to salary cap issues. Recently, the era of steroids has marked its stain on our precious game; once again damaging baseball’s credibility to its players and fans.
I understand your job is not the easiest, but I hope you realize what a special opportunity you have to be a part of the greatest game under the lights. There are many problems you have faced as the Commissioner. Everything from young Latin American ballplayers lying about their age to make them seem younger to prospective ball clubs, to the slow start and potential failure of the World Baseball Classic, and of course, steroids. However, I am not writing to you to talk about these problems. My concern lies within the pockets of every baseball player, fan, executive, and you, the Commissioner.
According to Yogi Berra, “A nickel aint worth a dime anymore.” This was the good old days of baseball when players where not concerned entirely about what they were getting paid. They loved the game and played it with passion. Nowadays, players are making such ridiculous amounts of money that it makes real baseball fans wonder if those players can even spend that much money in one lifetime. I am sure the Babe would roll over in his grave if he knew what has happened to player’s salaries.
The fact is elite players of today are making too much money. They are not even showing up to spring-training until they can have an extra million in guaranteed cash or a couple million added to each year of their contract. This is absurd. What message are these role models sending the youth of baseball when they see these men not join their team for practice and conditioning because of money? I understand baseball is a big business worth a lot of money; however, is it worth to put a price on the greatest game this country has ever seen?Let’s look at the numbers. Obviously, we can start with Alex Rodriquez who has signed the two largest contracts in baseball history. The Texas Rangers set the bar with A-Rod when they gave him a $252,000,000 contract from 2001-2010. He did not stay with Rangers, but was then given the largest deal in baseball history by the New York Yankees at $275,000,000 from 2008-2017. Granted he may not see every penny, but it is still astonishing to fans to see all these zeros given to one player. Arguably, he is the best player in the game, but there are still many players that can play at the same level and give him a run for his money. In return, they too want the large contracts.
Let’s now look at Manny Ramirez who will better help make my point. The plague of the Boston Red Sox is no giving headaches to the Los Angeles Dodgers. The man has not yet joined his club for spring-training because he is having contractual disputes between his agent and the club. He has been offered a two year, $45,000,000 deal; however, Mr. Ramirez wants more. He wants $25,000,000 a year and will not settle for less. Although he did not receive the deal he desired, he is now a Dodger and agreed to the initial deal proposed. One might blame this on his Agent Scott Boras, but one only has to look at the way Manny plays the game to realize he is all about the money. He might just be the best hitter in the game, but he does not hustle in the outfield and has even taken himself out of games. Many fans hate this and are losing respect for him everyday he does not put on a uniform.
I would also like to make an argument for those players who are underpaid. I understand there are rules surrounding contracts for rookie players and players with limited Major League service, but Tim Lincecum for the San Francisco Giants was the most dominating pitcher in all of baseball last season and even won the NL Cy Young award. He is not eligible for the big bucks yet, so he had to settle with an insulting deal of $650,000 for one year. The playing field needs to be equal and Lincecum deserves a big contract. Mr. Selig, if you are going to allow high profile players to make these types of numbers, then you need to make a change and allow every player to have the opportunity for large contracts.
Without a salary cap there is little anyone can do to stop these players from making the big bucks, but I am really writing to you because of your earnings. The players are not the only ones getting paid, you are too. According to Street and Smith’s Sports Business Journal, you made $18.35 million last year. That is a lot money Mr. Selig. Should a Commissioner be making this type of money? I am sure if you ask fans, writers, and even some players, they would say you are making too much.
I cannot ask you to turn down such dollar figures, but I can ask you to use some of the money to make the game of baseball better. This starts with the youth. Maybe some of your money along with other high profile players should be allocated for new ball-fields and leagues throughout the inner cities and poor areas of our country. Many major league players have been scouted since they were real young and had all the facilities they needed to make it to the Major Leagues. Unless an unfortunate child has phenomenal natural abilities, he is most likely not going to have the proper equipment or exposure to adequate coaching to enhance his skills.
How about this? Maybe you can use some millions to help lower ticket prices, parking, and concession stand prices so that more people can afford to make it out to the ball-park. The fans are the consumers of baseball, so maybe baseball can return the favor and give back to fans. I understand implementing a salary cap on baseball organizations would be virtually impossible; however, a maximum yearly salary for individual players is not too much to ask for.
You are the Commissioner of the greatest game ever played. With steroids aside, it is now up to you help bring baseball back to the fans. Please try and stop players form bellyaching about their contracts and simply, just play ball. Make this game fun again for everyone including the fans, players, and yourself. I am sure you have lost some sleep over what baseball has gone through during your time as Commissioner, but it really cannot be that hard to rest your head on that 18.35 million dollar pillow.
Sincerely,
Colin Greenbauer
Works Cited
"Baseball Money." 23 Oct. 2008 Online image. 16 Mar. 2009
"Bud Selig." Oniline image. 16 Mar. 2009
“Inside Alex Rodriguez’s Record Deal.” USAToday. 12 Dec. 2000 15 Mar. 2009
Fisher, Eric. “Selig’s Pay Climbs Past $18 Million.” Street & Smith’s Sports Business Journal. 2 Feb. 2009 2 Mar. 2009
“Lincecum, Giants Agree to $650K Contract.” Associated Press. 26 Feb. 2009 FOXSports.Com. 2 Mar. 2009
“Rodriguez Finalizes $275 M Deal with Yankees.” Associated Press. 13 Dec. 2007 ESPN. 15 Mar. 2009
Rosenthal, Ken. “Everyone is Happy’: Dodgers get Manny for $45 M.” FOXSports.com. 26 Feb. 2009 2 Mar. 2009
“Yogi Berra Quotes.” BrainyQuote. 15 Mar. 2009
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Dear MLB Commissioner Bud Selig,
I am writing this letter as a concerned lifelong baseball fan. Baseball is America’s pastime even though it has taken many blows throughout the years. It always seems to find a way to brush it off and step back in the box. In the early days it was the Great Depression and War World II. In 1994, a labor strike hit due to salary cap issues. Recently, the era of steroids have marked its stain on our precious game; once again damaging baseball’s credibility to its players and fans.
I understand your job is not the easiest, but I hope you realize what a special opportunity you have to be a part of the greatest game under the lights. There are many problems you have faced as the Commissioner. Everything from young Latin American ballplayers lying about their age to make them seem younger to prospective ball clubs, to the slow start and potential failure of the World Baseball Classic, and of course, steroids. However, I am not writing to you to talk about these problems. My concern lies within the pockets of every baseball player, fan, executive, and you, the Commissioner.
Money! According to Yogi Berra, “A nickel aint worth a dime anymore.” This was the good old days of baseball when players where not concerned entirely about what they were getting paid, they loved the game and played it with passion. Nowadays, players are making such ridiculous amounts of money that it makes real baseball fans wonder if those players can even spend that much money in one lifetime. I am sure the Babe would roll over in his grave if he knew what has happened to player’s salaries.
The fact is elite players of today are making too much money. They are not even showing up to spring training until they can have an extra million in guaranteed cash or a couple million added to each year of their contract. This is absurd. What message are these role models sending the youth of baseball when the see these men not join their team for training or not even playing the game because of money? I understand baseball is a big business worth a lot of money; however, at what cost is it worth to put a price on the greatest game this country has ever seen.
Let’s look at the numbers. Obviously, we can start with Alex Rodriquez who has signed the two largest contracts in baseball history. The Texas Rangers set the bar with A-Rod when they gave him a $252,000,000 contract from 2001-2010. He did not stay with Rangers, but was then given the largest deal in baseball history by the Yankees at $275,000,000 from 2008-2017. Granted he may not see every penny, but it is still astonishing to fans to see all these zeros given to one player. Arguably, he is the best player in the game, but there are still a many players that give him a run for his money. In return, they too want the big bucks.
Let’s now look at Manny Ramirez who will better help make my point. The plague of the Boston Red Sox is no giving headaches to the Los Angeles Dodgers. The man has not yet joined his club for spring training because he is having contractual disputes between his agent and the club. He has been offered a two year, $45 million dollar deal; however Manny is being Manny and wants more. He wants $25 million a year and will not settle for less. Although just today he agreed on that deal and is now a Dodger. One might blame this on his Agent Scott Boras, but you only have to look at the way Manny plays the game to realize he is all about the money. He might just be the best hitter in the game, but he does not hustle in the outfield and has even taken himself out of games. Fans hate this and are losing respect for him everyday he does not put on a uniform and play ball.
I would also like to make an argument for those players who are underpaid. I understand there are rules surrounding contracts for rookie players and players with limited Major League service, but Tim Lincecum for the San Francisco Giants was the most dominating pitcher in all of baseball last season and even won the NL Cy Young award. He is not eligible for the big bucks yet, so he had to settle with an insulting deal of $650,000 for one year. The playing field needs to be equal and Lincecum deserves a big contract.
Without a salary cap there is little anyone can do to stop these players from making the big bucks, but I am really writing to you because of your earnings. The players are not the only ones getting paid, you are too. According to Street and Smith’s Sports Business Journal, you made $18.35 million last year. That is a lot money Bud. Should a commissioner be making this much dough? I am sure if you ask fans, writers, and even some players, they would say you are making too much.
I cannot ask you to turn down such dollar figures, but I can ask you to use some of the money to make the game of baseball better. This starts with the youth. Maybe some of your money along with other high profile players should be allocated for new ball fields and leagues throughout the inner cities and poor areas of our country. Many major league players have been scouted since they were real young and had all the facilities they needed to make it to the bigs. Unless, an unfortunate child has phenomenal natural abilities, he is most likely not going to have to proper equipment or exposure to adequate coaching to be able enhance their skills have a shot at the pros.
How about this? Maybe you can use some millions to help lower ticket prices, parking, and concession stand prices so that more people can afford to make it out to the ballpark. The fans bring in big bucks for baseball, so maybe baseball can return the favor and give back to fans.
You are the Commissioner of the greatest game ever played. With steroids aside, its now up to you help bring baseball back to the fans. Please try and stop players form bellyaching about their contracts and simply, just play ball. Make this game fun again for everyone including the fans, players, and yourself. I am sure you have lost some sleep over what baseball has gone through during your time as Commissioner, but it really cannot be that hard to rest your eyes on that 18.35 million dollar pillow.
Sincerely,
Colin Greenbauer, Baseball Fan
I am writing this letter as a concerned lifelong baseball fan. Baseball is America’s pastime even though it has taken many blows throughout the years. It always seems to find a way to brush it off and step back in the box. In the early days it was the Great Depression and War World II. In 1994, a labor strike hit due to salary cap issues. Recently, the era of steroids have marked its stain on our precious game; once again damaging baseball’s credibility to its players and fans.
I understand your job is not the easiest, but I hope you realize what a special opportunity you have to be a part of the greatest game under the lights. There are many problems you have faced as the Commissioner. Everything from young Latin American ballplayers lying about their age to make them seem younger to prospective ball clubs, to the slow start and potential failure of the World Baseball Classic, and of course, steroids. However, I am not writing to you to talk about these problems. My concern lies within the pockets of every baseball player, fan, executive, and you, the Commissioner.
Money! According to Yogi Berra, “A nickel aint worth a dime anymore.” This was the good old days of baseball when players where not concerned entirely about what they were getting paid, they loved the game and played it with passion. Nowadays, players are making such ridiculous amounts of money that it makes real baseball fans wonder if those players can even spend that much money in one lifetime. I am sure the Babe would roll over in his grave if he knew what has happened to player’s salaries.
The fact is elite players of today are making too much money. They are not even showing up to spring training until they can have an extra million in guaranteed cash or a couple million added to each year of their contract. This is absurd. What message are these role models sending the youth of baseball when the see these men not join their team for training or not even playing the game because of money? I understand baseball is a big business worth a lot of money; however, at what cost is it worth to put a price on the greatest game this country has ever seen.
Let’s look at the numbers. Obviously, we can start with Alex Rodriquez who has signed the two largest contracts in baseball history. The Texas Rangers set the bar with A-Rod when they gave him a $252,000,000 contract from 2001-2010. He did not stay with Rangers, but was then given the largest deal in baseball history by the Yankees at $275,000,000 from 2008-2017. Granted he may not see every penny, but it is still astonishing to fans to see all these zeros given to one player. Arguably, he is the best player in the game, but there are still a many players that give him a run for his money. In return, they too want the big bucks.
Let’s now look at Manny Ramirez who will better help make my point. The plague of the Boston Red Sox is no giving headaches to the Los Angeles Dodgers. The man has not yet joined his club for spring training because he is having contractual disputes between his agent and the club. He has been offered a two year, $45 million dollar deal; however Manny is being Manny and wants more. He wants $25 million a year and will not settle for less. Although just today he agreed on that deal and is now a Dodger. One might blame this on his Agent Scott Boras, but you only have to look at the way Manny plays the game to realize he is all about the money. He might just be the best hitter in the game, but he does not hustle in the outfield and has even taken himself out of games. Fans hate this and are losing respect for him everyday he does not put on a uniform and play ball.
I would also like to make an argument for those players who are underpaid. I understand there are rules surrounding contracts for rookie players and players with limited Major League service, but Tim Lincecum for the San Francisco Giants was the most dominating pitcher in all of baseball last season and even won the NL Cy Young award. He is not eligible for the big bucks yet, so he had to settle with an insulting deal of $650,000 for one year. The playing field needs to be equal and Lincecum deserves a big contract.
Without a salary cap there is little anyone can do to stop these players from making the big bucks, but I am really writing to you because of your earnings. The players are not the only ones getting paid, you are too. According to Street and Smith’s Sports Business Journal, you made $18.35 million last year. That is a lot money Bud.
Should a commissioner be making this much dough? I am sure if you ask fans, writers, and even some players, they would say you are making too much.I cannot ask you to turn down such dollar figures, but I can ask you to use some of the money to make the game of baseball better. This starts with the youth. Maybe some of your money along with other high profile players should be allocated for new ball fields and leagues throughout the inner cities and poor areas of our country. Many major league players have been scouted since they were real young and had all the facilities they needed to make it to the bigs. Unless, an unfortunate child has phenomenal natural abilities, he is most likely not going to have to proper equipment or exposure to adequate coaching to be able enhance their skills have a shot at the pros.
How about this? Maybe you can use some millions to help lower ticket prices, parking, and concession stand prices so that more people can afford to make it out to the ballpark. The fans bring in big bucks for baseball, so maybe baseball can return the favor and give back to fans.
You are the Commissioner of the greatest game ever played. With steroids aside, its now up to you help bring baseball back to the fans. Please try and stop players form bellyaching about their contracts and simply, just play ball. Make this game fun again for everyone including the fans, players, and yourself. I am sure you have lost some sleep over what baseball has gone through during your time as Commissioner, but it really cannot be that hard to rest your eyes on that 18.35 million dollar pillow.
Sincerely,
Colin Greenbauer, Baseball Fan
Monday, February 23, 2009
Money Driven Media
The media has been labeled as the Fourth Estate of government. It is the voice of the people for the people. However, in today’s society, the media does not seem to be acting as an information agent for the people. The news industry is loaded with celebrity gossip and tabloid scandals, instead of important information that people need to know about serious events that are taking place in our country. Of course there are many media outlets that present information about our current economic recession and the War on Terror, but are they filtered? The media is dominated by conglomerates that have one agenda, money. Advertisements have penetrated the media and CEO’s drive what is presented to the public. Is the press able to freely present the information the public really needs to know? Are they censored and restricted to present a certain bias that is perpetuated by the executives and owners of the media? The media is driven by the biases the companies want to portray. The freedom of the press has seemed to be blurred by money and the influence of media owners. Media censorship is an issue that needs to be explored so that the public can get the facts and truly act as the Fourth Estate.
With the recent boom in the information age, many new outlets are able to get their voice heard. For instance, blogs now give the everyday person an opportunity to reach a mass audience. This is a start; however, the major networks are still censored and news is filtered to meet the agenda of media owners and their investors. Media owners and operators have a stronghold on the material and information that is broadcasted over their channels.
According to CNN Correspondent Ali Velshi, concerning the language associated with our current economic recession, “We’re very careful not to throw words around like ‘meltdown’ and ‘free fall’." Moreover, even The Wall Street Journal has censored words like “crash” and “pandemonium." Is this appropriate considering our economy has never seen such a crash in this history of this country? It is what it is and the public needs to know where the market stands, even if it is catastrophic news. Even though media ownership has every right to uphold an image and censor themselves, the government needs to censor themselves by not prohibiting certain types of speech. According to President George W. Bush, “The fundamentals of our economy are strong." This statement was made after over half a year of unemployment rates on the rise. Author Daniel Gross refers to this type of restricted speech as “happy talk.” He states this type of speech could be tolerated in a world where countless Americans are prospering; however, this is not the case and the people are financially suffering.
Some Americans are taking action. Even though the people cannot change what guidelines media outlets set for their writers and journalists, many people are utilizing the new mediums to get their voice heard. Project Censored is an organization that is committed to presenting “real news” that contests the major media news markets. Their main goal is to educate college students about our current media structure and emphasizes media research to help sift out the propaganda that fills the news. They support a free and independent media enterprise, and work to help provide Americans with the information needed to be properly informed. They strive to bring the people out of the dark and realize they are being subjected to bias news.
The media is not dominated and operated by the people, it’s fundamentally run by the elite and the executives that pay the bills and make the money. According to the President of Project Censored, Peter Philips, “Given this interlocked media network, it is more than safe to say that major media in the United States effectively represent the interests of corporate America, and that the media elite are the watchdogs of acceptable ideological messages, the parameters of news and information content, and the general use of media resources.” He goes on to say that “journalists are not immune from management influence.” They want their stories to be published, permitted, and printed; therefore, even making editors realize they have boundaries that need to be upheld.
It’s understandable that media agencies need to make a profit; however, at what cost? This country was founded on beliefs of democracy and free enterprise. Money drives our current media market, which means that censorship is inevitable. A good and strong image is essential in today’s world; however, is it worth compromising American’s first amendment right to free press? As a mass communication and communications student and a potential employee in the media, I too will be faced with these same issues. Its hard to say where I will stand considering money will be an important factor. What I do know is, if given the opportunity to open the eyes of Americans and given the ability to present the public with facts that are needed to be properly informed, then I have succeeded and upheld my right to freedom of speech.
With the recent boom in the information age, many new outlets are able to get their voice heard. For instance, blogs now give the everyday person an opportunity to reach a mass audience. This is a start; however, the major networks are still censored and news is filtered to meet the agenda of media owners and their investors. Media owners and operators have a stronghold on the material and information that is broadcasted over their channels.
According to CNN Correspondent Ali Velshi, concerning the language associated with our current economic recession, “We’re very careful not to throw words around like ‘meltdown’ and ‘free fall’." Moreover, even The Wall Street Journal has censored words like “crash” and “pandemonium." Is this appropriate considering our economy has never seen such a crash in this history of this country? It is what it is and the public needs to know where the market stands, even if it is catastrophic news. Even though media ownership has every right to uphold an image and censor themselves, the government needs to censor themselves by not prohibiting certain types of speech. According to President George W. Bush, “The fundamentals of our economy are strong." This statement was made after over half a year of unemployment rates on the rise. Author Daniel Gross refers to this type of restricted speech as “happy talk.” He states this type of speech could be tolerated in a world where countless Americans are prospering; however, this is not the case and the people are financially suffering.
Some Americans are taking action. Even though the people cannot change what guidelines media outlets set for their writers and journalists, many people are utilizing the new mediums to get their voice heard. Project Censored is an organization that is committed to presenting “real news” that contests the major media news markets. Their main goal is to educate college students about our current media structure and emphasizes media research to help sift out the propaganda that fills the news. They support a free and independent media enterprise, and work to help provide Americans with the information needed to be properly informed. They strive to bring the people out of the dark and realize they are being subjected to bias news.
The media is not dominated and operated by the people, it’s fundamentally run by the elite and the executives that pay the bills and make the money. According to the President of Project Censored, Peter Philips, “Given this interlocked media network, it is more than safe to say that major media in the United States effectively represent the interests of corporate America, and that the media elite are the watchdogs of acceptable ideological messages, the parameters of news and information content, and the general use of media resources.” He goes on to say that “journalists are not immune from management influence.” They want their stories to be published, permitted, and printed; therefore, even making editors realize they have boundaries that need to be upheld.
It’s understandable that media agencies need to make a profit; however, at what cost? This country was founded on beliefs of democracy and free enterprise. Money drives our current media market, which means that censorship is inevitable. A good and strong image is essential in today’s world; however, is it worth compromising American’s first amendment right to free press? As a mass communication and communications student and a potential employee in the media, I too will be faced with these same issues. Its hard to say where I will stand considering money will be an important factor. What I do know is, if given the opportunity to open the eyes of Americans and given the ability to present the public with facts that are needed to be properly informed, then I have succeeded and upheld my right to freedom of speech.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Money Driven Media
The media and the press have been labeled as the Fourth Estate. It is the voice of the people for the people. However, in today’s society, the media does not seem to be acting as an information agent for the people. The news industry is loaded with celebrity gossip and tabloid scandals, instead of important information that people need to know about serious events that are taking place in our country. Of course there are many media outlets that present information about our current economic recession and the War on Terror, but are they filtered? The media is dominated by conglomerates that have one agenda, money. Advertisements have penetrated the media and CEO’s drive what is presented to the public. Is the press able to freely present the information the public really needs to know? Are they censored and restricted to present a certain bias that is perpetuated by the executives and owners of the media? The media is driven by the biases the companies want to portray. The freedom of the press has seemed to be blurred by money and the influence of media owners. Media censorship is an issue that needs to be explored so that the public can get the facts and truly act as the Fourth Estate.
With the recent boom in the information age, many new outlets are able to get their voice heard. For instance, blogs now give the everyday person an opportunity to reach a mass audience. This is a start; however, the major networks are still censored and news is filtered to meet the agenda of media owners and their investors. Media owners and operators have a stronghold on the material and information that is broadcasted over their channels.
According to CNN Correspondent Ali Velshi, concerning the language associated with our current economic recession, “We’re very careful not to throw words around like ‘meltdown’ and ‘free fall’,” (Gross). Moreover, even The Wall Street Journal has censored words like “crash” and “pandemonium” (Gross). Is this appropriate considering our economy has never seen such a crash in this history of this country? It is what it is and the public needs to know where the market stands, even if it is catastrophic news. Even though media ownership has every right to uphold an image and censor themselves, the government needs to censor themselves by not prohibiting certain types of speech. According to President George W. Bush, “The fundamentals of our economy are strong” (Gross). This statement was made after over half a year of unemployment rates on the rise. Author Daniel Gross refers to this type restricted speech as “happy talk.” He states this type of speech could be tolerated in a world where countless Americans are prospering; however, this is not the case and the people are financially suffering.
Some Americans are taking action. Even though the people cannot change what guidelines media outlets set for their writers and journalist, many people are utilizing the new mediums to get their voice heard. Project Censored is an organization that is committed to presenting “real news” that contests the major media news markets (Lendman). Their main goal is to educate college students about our current media structure and emphasizes media research to help filter out the propaganda that fills the news. They support a free and independent media enterprise and work to help provide Americans with the information needed to be properly informed. They strive to bring the people out of the dark and realize they are being subjected to bias news (Lendman).
The media is not dominated and operated by the people, it’s fundamentally run by the elite and the executives that pay the bills and make the money. According to the President of Project Censored, Peter Philips, “Given this interlocked media network, it is more than safe to say that major media in the United States effectively represent the interests of corporate America, and that the media elite are the watchdogs of acceptable ideological messages, the parameters of news and information content, and the general use of media resources.” He goes on to say that “journalists are not immune from management influence.” They want their stories to be published, permitted, and printed; therefore, even making editors realize they have boundaries that need to be upheld.
It’s understandable that media agencies need to make a profit; however, at what cost? This country was founded on beliefs of democracy and free enterprise. Money drives our current media market and that sometimes means that censorship is inevitable. A good and strong image is essential in today’s world; however, is it worth compromising American’s first amendment right to free press? As a mass communication and communications student and a potential employee in the media, I too will be faced with these same issues. Its hard to say where I will stand considering money will be an important factor. What I do know is, if given the opportunity to open the eyes of Americans and am able to present the public with facts that are needed to be properly informed, then I have succeeded and upheld my right to freedom of speech.
With the recent boom in the information age, many new outlets are able to get their voice heard. For instance, blogs now give the everyday person an opportunity to reach a mass audience. This is a start; however, the major networks are still censored and news is filtered to meet the agenda of media owners and their investors. Media owners and operators have a stronghold on the material and information that is broadcasted over their channels.
According to CNN Correspondent Ali Velshi, concerning the language associated with our current economic recession, “We’re very careful not to throw words around like ‘meltdown’ and ‘free fall’,” (Gross). Moreover, even The Wall Street Journal has censored words like “crash” and “pandemonium” (Gross). Is this appropriate considering our economy has never seen such a crash in this history of this country? It is what it is and the public needs to know where the market stands, even if it is catastrophic news. Even though media ownership has every right to uphold an image and censor themselves, the government needs to censor themselves by not prohibiting certain types of speech. According to President George W. Bush, “The fundamentals of our economy are strong” (Gross). This statement was made after over half a year of unemployment rates on the rise. Author Daniel Gross refers to this type restricted speech as “happy talk.” He states this type of speech could be tolerated in a world where countless Americans are prospering; however, this is not the case and the people are financially suffering.
Some Americans are taking action. Even though the people cannot change what guidelines media outlets set for their writers and journalist, many people are utilizing the new mediums to get their voice heard. Project Censored is an organization that is committed to presenting “real news” that contests the major media news markets (Lendman). Their main goal is to educate college students about our current media structure and emphasizes media research to help filter out the propaganda that fills the news. They support a free and independent media enterprise and work to help provide Americans with the information needed to be properly informed. They strive to bring the people out of the dark and realize they are being subjected to bias news (Lendman).
The media is not dominated and operated by the people, it’s fundamentally run by the elite and the executives that pay the bills and make the money. According to the President of Project Censored, Peter Philips, “Given this interlocked media network, it is more than safe to say that major media in the United States effectively represent the interests of corporate America, and that the media elite are the watchdogs of acceptable ideological messages, the parameters of news and information content, and the general use of media resources.” He goes on to say that “journalists are not immune from management influence.” They want their stories to be published, permitted, and printed; therefore, even making editors realize they have boundaries that need to be upheld.
It’s understandable that media agencies need to make a profit; however, at what cost? This country was founded on beliefs of democracy and free enterprise. Money drives our current media market and that sometimes means that censorship is inevitable. A good and strong image is essential in today’s world; however, is it worth compromising American’s first amendment right to free press? As a mass communication and communications student and a potential employee in the media, I too will be faced with these same issues. Its hard to say where I will stand considering money will be an important factor. What I do know is, if given the opportunity to open the eyes of Americans and am able to present the public with facts that are needed to be properly informed, then I have succeeded and upheld my right to freedom of speech.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Research Methods Exercise
1) The Tamil Tigers is a guerrilla organization that is trying to establish a free and independent nation in Sri Lanka, Eelam.
“Tamil Tigers." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 5 June 2008.
2) Minister Gareth Thomas is a member of the Parliament for Harrow West and the DFID, which deals with international development.
PTI news agency, New Delhi, in English 1006 gmt 3 May 07
3) The Tamil Nadu is the opposition in the Tamil conflict, especially to the Tamil Tigers.
Economist; 11/10/2007, Vol. 385 Issue 8554, p54-54, 8/9p, 1 color
4) The aircraft they used was two light fix-winged aircrafts.
Anjana Pasricha, New Delhi, 26 March 2007,” Sri Lanka: Tamil Tigers Launch First Ever Air Strike.”
5) U.S. is in favor of reform the democratic political system, but is opposed to the establishment of another independent state.
K. Alan Kronstadt, “Sri Lanka: Background and U.S. relations”, Congressional Research Service, Updated August 15, 2007.
“Tamil Tigers." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 5 June 2008
2) Minister Gareth Thomas is a member of the Parliament for Harrow West and the DFID, which deals with international development.
PTI news agency, New Delhi, in English 1006 gmt 3 May 07
3) The Tamil Nadu is the opposition in the Tamil conflict, especially to the Tamil Tigers.
Economist; 11/10/2007, Vol. 385 Issue 8554, p54-54, 8/9p, 1 color
4) The aircraft they used was two light fix-winged aircrafts.
Anjana Pasricha, New Delhi, 26 March 2007,” Sri Lanka: Tamil Tigers Launch First Ever Air Strike.”
5) U.S. is in favor of reform the democratic political system, but is opposed to the establishment of another independent state.
K. Alan Kronstadt, “Sri Lanka: Background and U.S. relations”, Congressional Research Service, Updated August 15, 2007.
Saturday, January 31, 2009
Politically Incorrect Wildcats
I am responding to the blog titled, “Three Cheers for Kentucky Grand Jury: Bucks Trend to Criminalize un-PC Speech,” by Debbie Schlussel. Two college students that attend the University of Kentucky created an effigy of Barack Obama from a tree on their campus. They were charged with stealing the pants and shirt from their fraternity, even though other members claimed this to be false. Charges were dropped; however, the lawyer fees were not.
Where should the line be drawn? What is free speech? The line is blurred in this case. Campuses across America have plenty of free speech zones where students have the freedom to say and present what they wish. Although offensive, immature, and downright ignorant, these two students should not have gone through the hassle they did. University officials should have just simply told them they need to take it down, just in case violence would ensue. These students should have been reprimanded and told to try and act like a Kentucky Wildcat, and show a little class.
College campuses need to make a valid effort not to stifle the freedoms of their students. This election has given a voice to the college youth; therefore, has made them a force to be reckoned with. Usually, with the good comes the bad. Even at Arizona State University, officials allow preachers to enrage students by telling them that they are doomed and going to hell for acting like a stereotypical college student. Anti-abortionists are allowed to blow up pictures to a billboard status of fetuses that have been aborted. Should this be allowed? Absolutely! If not, a public university is only taking away what Americans have fought so hard for. Like it or not, we all have to deal with it.
As far as a response to the people who commented on this blog. I am not sure if Independent Conservative was being sarcastic or simply informing us where he/she stands. It sounded more like his response belongs on the DailyKos. I agree with Richard who states, “Who polices the police?” Is Obama above the law? I do not know, I hope not; otherwise, we are all in for one wild rollercoaster ride.
This is just how it is! With Obama in office, we are all going to see acts like this pop up all over the country. Although, I am not shocked this happened in Kentucky. Their will always be two sides; therefore, one would hope people could be tolerant of others who have different views. In addition, I think events like this will only increase if Obama makes any errors in judgment with the many decisions he will have to make. He has a lot to prove to the American people, even though he has reached an almost scary level of celebrity.
Where should the line be drawn? What is free speech? The line is blurred in this case. Campuses across America have plenty of free speech zones where students have the freedom to say and present what they wish. Although offensive, immature, and downright ignorant, these two students should not have gone through the hassle they did. University officials should have just simply told them they need to take it down, just in case violence would ensue. These students should have been reprimanded and told to try and act like a Kentucky Wildcat, and show a little class.
College campuses need to make a valid effort not to stifle the freedoms of their students. This election has given a voice to the college youth; therefore, has made them a force to be reckoned with. Usually, with the good comes the bad. Even at Arizona State University, officials allow preachers to enrage students by telling them that they are doomed and going to hell for acting like a stereotypical college student. Anti-abortionists are allowed to blow up pictures to a billboard status of fetuses that have been aborted. Should this be allowed? Absolutely! If not, a public university is only taking away what Americans have fought so hard for. Like it or not, we all have to deal with it.
As far as a response to the people who commented on this blog. I am not sure if Independent Conservative was being sarcastic or simply informing us where he/she stands. It sounded more like his response belongs on the DailyKos. I agree with Richard who states, “Who polices the police?” Is Obama above the law? I do not know, I hope not; otherwise, we are all in for one wild rollercoaster ride.
This is just how it is! With Obama in office, we are all going to see acts like this pop up all over the country. Although, I am not shocked this happened in Kentucky. Their will always be two sides; therefore, one would hope people could be tolerant of others who have different views. In addition, I think events like this will only increase if Obama makes any errors in judgment with the many decisions he will have to make. He has a lot to prove to the American people, even though he has reached an almost scary level of celebrity.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Jan 28 Reading Assignments
Bloggers: an army of irregulars, by Paul Reynolds
Explain in your own words how Reynolds thinks that blogs are most useful. What do they do well, and what do they do poorly? Is Reynolds fair in his criticism?
Blogs are most useful because they have given the power to the people to hold others accountable for what they say or do. Bloggers have been able to point out when mistakes or false accusations have been made and action has resulted because of this. However, they have been known to criticize and attack in an almost ruthless manner. Yes, I believe he is fair in his criticism because he looks at both ends of the spectrum. If bloggers did not criticize and attack, then they might not have been able to point out some mistakes that have been made.
Why bosses blog - and why it's cheesy, by Stephen Evans
Why does Evans think that many corporate blogs are, in his words, "regulation corporate speak"? What's wrong with that?
It seems to be very easy for executives and employees to side with their products and services; in addition, take shots at their competitors. The difficulty with that is there might be legal consequences for some of things that are said due to contracts that employees have signed.
Michael Crow's blog
Look through President Crow's blog and see if you can find instances of Evans' "regulation corporate speak" or times when Crow is being more personal. Quote him in your reply. Which do you find more effective? Why?
President Crow seems to use “regulation corporate speak” throughout the blogs. He states, “If adopted, they would take ASU back to the per student state investment levels it had in 1989.” He speaks of the policy surrounding the budget cuts. He is trying to be more personnel when he starts out with, “I am deeply concerned for the future of
GM's Official Blog, "FastLane"
Again keeping Evans' article in mind, how would you describe the usefulness of this blog? Who might find it interesting? In other words, who is the blog's intended audience?
This blog is useful because a large automobile corporation is trying to provide cars that environmentally efficient. Even though cars have been a huge factor in polluting our environment, electric cars can help clean up the mess. The intended audience would be anyone that is in the market for an automobile, especially and electric car. Even GM’s competition or people who a concerned for the environment.
SYNNEX CEO's blog
Again keeping Evans' article in mind, how would you describe the usefulness of this blog? Who might find it interesting? In other words, who is the blog's intended audience?
The blog is useful because it is providing tips from different authors of effective strategies for becoming a better employer and employee. Setting goals and priorities would make for a more effective employee and working environment. This audience would employers and employees who are looking to make their jobs more manageable and even profitable.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)